Investigar para que la evidencia forense sea confiable y adecuada a la decisión judicial

[1] Saks MJ, Koehler JJ. The coming paradigm shift in forensic identification science. Science 2005;309:892–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111565.

[2] Ulery BT, Hicklin RA, Buscaglia J, Roberts MA. Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:7733–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018707108.

[3] Ulery BT, Hicklin RA, Buscaglia J, Roberts MA. Repeatability and reproducibility of decisions by latent fingerprint examiners. PloS One 2012;7:e32800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032800.

[4] Hicklin RA, Winer KR, Kish PE, Parks CL, Chapman W, Dunagan K, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of conclusions by forensic bloodstain pattern analysts. Forensic Sci Int 2021;325:110856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110856.

[5] Dror IE, Charlton D, Péron AE. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications. Forensic Sci Int 2006;156:74–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017.

[6] Cooper GS, Meterko V. Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review. Forensic Sci Int 2019;297:35–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.016.

[7] Ong BB, Milne N. Quality assurance in forensic pathology. Malays J Pathol 2009;31:17–22.

[8] Warner M, Braun PA, Brown PA. Public Health Impact: How Medicolegal Death Investigation Data Help the Living. Acad Forensic Pathol 2017;7:xiv–xvi. https://doi.org/10.1177/192536211700700405.